Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Burgess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Burgess

Very bias article, without correct formatting, links or relevance whatsoever. Most likely written by the subject of the article herself. ZEROpumpkins (talk) 10:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, to Hi-5, lacks WP:RS, no notability outside Hi-5, although bigger things are around the corner. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, to Hi-5. --Killerofcruft (talk) 15:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hi-5 Mardetanha ^talk 20:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but cleanup: Hi-5 are a highly notable band here in Oz, somewhat like the Wiggles. Several members past and present have been involved with projects outside of Hi-5 too. Remember that article quality is no reason to delete. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:MUSIC - I don't see where she's notable independent of Hi-5, unless that show she did in Grade 9 was a bigger deal than the article makes it appear. Townlake (talk) 05:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Is this going to be a merge and redirect, or is it going to be a delete and redirect? (Note, however, you can't do merge and delete.) Thanks. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Given the current content of the article, I'd go for delete and redirect. Townlake (talk) 01:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A merge of info then delete of the redirect is possible, no? Anyway Delete and Redirect to Hi-5.Yobmod (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - membership in Hi-5 is sufficient claim to notability --T-rex 23:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.